Spectral Management, or, Ways To Think About EQ and Mixing
Dave Moulton, with assistance from Alex Case and Peter Alhadeff
March 1993
Dave talks about the huge range of sounds we can hear and how these dimensions should be approached from a mixing standpoint.
Figure 4: Table showing the Ten Octaves of the Audio Spectrum, giving a few more particulars about the musical, acoustical and subjective qualities of each octave. Also, I’ve given the approximate wavelengths of frequencies in each octave. This, coupled with a basic knowledge of how diffraction and reflection work, is primary information for understanding acoustical problems in rooms.
| Octave # |
Octave Center Freq. |
Octave Range |
Physical Wavelengths |
Musical Range |
Subjective Character and key cues. |
| 10 |
16000 |
10-20K |
1.5"-.7" |
extreme high overtones |
Extreme highs, airiness, hiss, sizzle. Upper “edge.” |
| 9 |
8000 |
5-10K |
3"-1.5" |
overtones |
Highs, treble, metallic brightness, sibilance, brilliance |
| 8 |
4000 |
2.5-5K |
6"-3" |
overtones |
Presence, edge of consonance, brightness, speech recognition cues |
| 7 |
2000 |
1.25-2.5K |
1'-6" |
overtones |
Hardness, bite, intensity, loudness, definition. Phantom image cues |
| 6 |
1000 |
640-1.25K |
2'-1' |
Soprano! |
Upper pitches, major overtones for most instruments |
| 5 |
500 |
320-640 |
4'-2' |
Alto, Soprano |
Body, richness, fullness, rounded. Warmth. |
| 4 |
250 |
160-320 |
8'-4' |
Middle C, Tenor, Alto |
Mudrange. Thickness, tubbiness, thumpiness. Spaciousness in stereo reverb. |
| 3 |
125 |
80-160 |
16'-8' |
Baritone, Tenor |
Upper bass, harmonic foundation octave. |
| 2 |
62.5 |
40-80 |
32'-16' |
Low C, Bass |
Lower bass, bottom of musical pitches. Sonic foundation. |
| 1 |
31.25 |
20-40 |
64'-32' |
non-pitched bass sounds |
Infrasound, unpitched lows, "big" natural sounds, i.e. thunder, earthquakes. |
There’s a lot to talk about here. Musical functions exist in various ranges, overall apparent loudness is very much a function of how these octaves are treated, and both the specific tonal qualities of various instruments
and the overall quality and character of the music is determined by the distribution of energy among these octaves.
This is where equalization comes from, of course. Equalization can be thought of as one of the primary applications of spectral management, and much or most of what you do in terms of spectral management will be done with equalizers. But before you grab for the Q control of your latest parametric equalizer, there are some other things to consider.
The first has to do with the nature of pitched musical sounds. Such sounds all have “pitches,” such as “G above Middle C.” The range of such pitches, in actual musical practice, is about the sum of human voice ranges, or from about Low C (approximately 65 Hz.) to High C (approximately 1044 Hz.). So the range of such pitches is four octaves.
But, the musical sound identified as having a pitch of Middle C does not exist ONLY at 261 Hz. It exists as an array or range of frequencies whose lowest member is probably 261 Hz. and which stretches across all the audible octaves above 261 Hz. Probably, the bulk of the physical power of this musical sound lies in octave bands far from Octave 4.
The point about this is that although there
is a range of pitches (as distinguished from frequencies), they are subjective mental constructs we use for organizing our own sense of the “highness” or “lowness” of a sound and patterns of highness and lowness (melody), and they don’t represent the frequencies present in those musical sounds. These frequencies include, as you probably know, the overtones or harmonics of the sound, while the assigned “pitch frequency” is called the “fundamental.” The physical power of that musical sound is the sum of the powers of all the harmonics, and that power is distributed across the spectrum as a function of the relative power of each of the various harmonics.
comments: (1)