Moulton Laboratories
the art and science of sound

All about our amazing auditory system.

< 1 2 3 4 5

And Now, Some Questions

Obviously, it is not the gas pressure variations that we are interested in. It is, rather, a complex range of information and emotions that is CARRIED BY SUCH PRESSURE VARIATIONS that is what we are really interested in transmitting and perceiving.

It is useful to ask some questions about that information, such as:
  • What are the features that allow us to distinguish one sound from another?
  • How do we distinguish between the sounds of sources and sounds of reflections?
  • How do we extract the sense of multiple pitches from a single complex wave?
  • Why don’t we do this for all complex waves?
  • How come we don’t get hopelessly confused by all the reflections from the environment? Come to think of it, how come we barely even notice them?
  • How can we recognize Samantha’s voice on the telephone, when it has been band-limited to a very small percentage of her original sound?
  • What makes it possible for us to “hear” that a room has been freshly painted, or that we’ve added a sofa?
The fact that all these things occur so naturally and effortlessly in our perception obscures the complexity of the underlying system. When we make recordings, the mechanical ears that we use, microphones, don’t have that same complex underlying system. As a result, they lose a lot. When we play the resulting audio signals back through loudspeakers, they lose even more. Physically speaking, it is not a pretty picture! That it works at all is miraculous.

If we’re gonna be good, really good, at our craft of recording engineering it behooves us to get a handle on how us humans perceive this stuff, and then to do what we can to make the sounds our loudspeakers put out as useful, informative and entertaining as possible for the human auditory systems possessed by our clients and their fans.

This involves some hard thinking. Most of the operation of the hearing system is concealed from us (that’s why I call it pre-conscious). So we have to work on our ability to infer what is going on by observing the relationship between what we perceive and what we know by physical measurement is happening. A lot of it, when we get into it, is pretty spooky.

Hard thinking is mainly a process of asking hard questions. For instance, the process of neural transmission from the ear to the brain isn’t instantaneous – in fact it takes something like 5 – 10 milliseconds! So we’re always perceiving a delayed version of what happened. Given that that is so, how can musicians play together? And how come we don’t notice the delay?

Another puzzler from the same dismal swamp: we don’t perceive the early reflections of a sound source in a small room for up to about 40 milliseconds – this is part of what is called the Precedence Effect. How come? Is this part of what we call masking, where one sound artifact conceals another? And speaking of masking, did you know that under certain circumstances a sound can be masked by another sound that comes AFTER it? How can this be?

A BIG question from the realm of stereophony has to do with the phantom image. How come there is one? Why don’t we get phantom images from two violins playing the same note? Why does this only seem to happen with loudspeakers? Zork-11 doesn’t get it!

How can we hear chords? Why don’t we hear overtones as chords? Why don’t we hear barometric changes (they’re gas pressure-variations too, you know)? How come reverb doesn’t confuse the hell out of us? How can we actually like the stuff? Why isn’t an anechoic chamber the best place to play music?

As we begin to pull the answers to these questions together, using what we know about the origins of the hearing mechanism and what it needed to do to help us survive in a Darwinian world of natural selection, we can begin to build up a little bit more robust and sensible understanding of what is really going on with our hearing, and how to use that knowledge for fun and profit.

Next month, we’ll take a hard look at what I call the Audio Window, the physical ranges within which we perceive sound. We’ll also consider how analog and digital audio are fitted to those ranges. Ain’t science fun?

Thanks for listening.

Dave Moulton is a recent Grammy nominee and author of Total Recording and Golden Ears. You can complain to him about anything at moultonlabs.com
< 1 2 3 4 5

COMMENTS

River Vale, NJ     Jun 16, 2006 01:25 PM
Excellent overview of what goes on in the most sophisticated piece of audio processing gear any of us will ever have the opportunity to use! Since I am a doctoral-candidate audiologist, and an auditory researcher at Columbia University, I can tell you it gets much more fascinating (and even weirder!) than anything you have touched upon here. But that is a topic for another day.

I first wish to thank you for giving our sense of hearing the well-deserved respect and mention that it so deserves. It is an often-overlooked component of the signal chain in our discussions of gear and signal processing. Unfortunately, it is also too often abused. Everyday I see the effects of the noisy world we live in on the human ear. I am referring not only to the loss of hearing sensitivity, but also the loss of frequency specificity in the cochlea (think psychophysical tuning curves here) resulting from inner hair cell damage, which is very difficult to rehabilitate.

Hearing loss is easy to prevent, yet once the damage has been inflicted, there is (usually) no going back. It is simply gone. There is some promising early work in the area of hair-cell regeneration (at least 20 years off even by the most optimistic estimates) as well as various therapies centered on the concept of pharmacologic prophylaxis, including N-acetylcysteine, and the more mundane vitamin C. However, the pharmacological therapies are still unproven, and are very controversial.

As audio professionals, part of your overall healthcare should include annual hearing tests, including Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs), even if your audiogram is “normal.” Up to 25% of your outer hair cells can be obliterated before a hearing loss will be evident on a basic audiogram, and DPOAEs are highly sensitive to this early damage. Early detection is the key concept here. Also, try to monitor at conservative levels (less than 85 dB SPL is good), and whenever this is not possible use custom – molded musician’s earplugs (especially for live sound work).
Dean Mancuso MS CCC-A 
Winter Park, FL     Aug 29, 2006 06:46 PM
Did you finish the article? You have me on the edge of my seat! Please, don't let me fall off!! Where are the answers to those great questions you had??
Peter Banjo 
Groton, MA     Aug 30, 2006 08:03 AM
Oops! Thanks for bringing this to my attention! We're missing a couple of pretty good articles.

The next article in the series is The Audio Window, which is here. Following that are two articles: "Hearing: the Highs and Lows of It" and "Hearing: the Louds and Softs of It." I will get webguy to get these included ASAP. In the meantime, you can download these from

http://moultonlabs.com/berklee/

I hope this helps.

Best regards,

Dave
davemoulton 
Winter Park, FL     Aug 30, 2006 02:03 PM
Thanks for the quick reply. =)

It will take me a while to get through everything, but I'm sure it will time well spent. Awesome.
Peter Banjo 

Post a Comment



rss2

rss atom